In the latest installment of the "FDR and Stalin were moral equals" series, badlydrawnjeff was again presented with the same conversation he was presented all the other times. He once again claimed that he did not say what anyone else with a fraction of intellectual honesty or sincerity would have realized he very much did say. The offending comment that started this whole thing was when he claimed, in one of the most breath-taking and bald examples of the big lie I've ever seen that FDR and Stalin were moral equals, and that the New Deal was directly comparable to the generic social programs of Ioseb Jugashvili.
Social programs, I might add, which were starve people and take their stuff, and enslave in giant slave-labor camps anyone he objected. His actual comment included the amazingly stupid line about not being sure whether or not the Internment camps involved slave labor, to morally compare the spasms of racist bigotry in WWII America targeting ethnic Japanese on the mainland to the Gulag Archipelago in the USSR, where people could literally face the prospect of show trials for non-existent crimes in the Gulag after being sent to the Gulag for non-existent crimes to start with.
However, in this installment he upped the ante by being deliberately asked whether or not he sincerely meant that the USA had a program akin to collectivization in the Soviet Union. This would be the root of the Ukrainian Terror-Famine, which was part of a USSR-wide phenomenon at its most lethal in the entire USSR in Kazakhstan, which lost 25% of the population to Stalin's Terror.
At this point, he's gone as far off the deep end as 67th Tigers in *his* recent comment about a MODERATE British action in the case of intervention in the ACW being the deliberate burning of the entirety of New York City at the time, without specifying even that civilians would be evacuated first ala Atlanta.